Elizabeth Hopkins is a partner at Kantor & Kantor. After a long and fulfilling career at the United States Department of Labor, where she gained substantial experience working on pension, healthcare and other ERISA issues, she joined the firm in 2018. She represents clients who have been denied pension, healthcare, disability and life insurance benefits. She has practiced in the ERISA field since 1989 and is a passionate, knowledgeable and creative advocate for those who have been denied the employee benefits to which they are entitled.
Prior to joining Kantor & Kantor, Elizabeth worked for three decades at the Department of Labor, where she specialized in appellate litigation and ERISA. From 2002 through 2017, she headed the ERISA appellate and amicus program, where she oversaw nationwide litigation designed to advance the interests of workers and their families with regard to their employee benefits. She filed over 100friend-of-the-court and party briefs and presented arguments in federal courts of appeals throughout the country and supervised others in doing so. She also participated in formulating departmental positions and briefing ERISA issues in the Supreme Court, where she worked on many of the important ERISA cases of the last two decades. In addition, she worked on a number of regulatory issues and court challenges to ERISA and Affordable Care Act regulations adopted by the Department of Labor. During her tenure at the Department of Labor she was a frequent speaker at ERISA conferences and bar-sponsored events, and taught numerous classes on ERISA topics and brief writing. She was also the recipient of many awards for her work on particular projects and cases, and was one of the first recipients of a prestigious annual award for brief writing.
Throughout her long career, Elizabeth has been motivated by the desire to help others and to fight for justice for individuals. In addition to her paid work, Elizabeth has been involved in many activities with the District of Columbia Bar and the American Bar Association. She is a member of American College of Employee Benefits Counsel, where she has served as a judge on their annual writing competition. She has been a contributing writer and editor on the American Bar Association’s, Employee Benefits Law, and has recently been appointed to serve on the Board of Senior Editors for that publication. Elizabeth is also a life-long volunteer for a wide range of organizations, from the Special Olympics, to a homeless shelter, to the Red Cross, to an after-school program at a Los Angeles public high school. Most recently, she traveled to Dilley, Texas to represent detained migrant women and their children claiming asylum.
Elizabeth is very excited to bring her skill and experience to representing clients at Kantor & Kantor with their ERISA claims.
Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014)
(amicus brief successfully arguing for the elimination of a presumption adopted by numerous courts of appeals that investment in company stock is prudent)
Hardt v. Reliance Standard, 560 U.S. 242 (2010)
(amicus brief successfully arguing for a more lenient standard for awards of attorney’s fees for plaintiff’s attorneys in ERISA cases)
MetLife v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105 (2008)
(amicus brief successfully arguing for consideration of a fiduciary’s conflict by a court reviewing a benefit denial)
LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg& Assocs., 552 U.S. 248 (2008)
(amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA plan participant could sue for plan losses)
Unum Life Ins. Co. v. Ward, 526 U.S. 358 (2001)
(amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA does not preempt state insurance laws)
Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney, 530 U.S. 238 (2000)
(amicus brief successfully arguing that plan participants can sue those who knowingly participate in a fiduciary breach)
Osberg v. Foot Locker, 862 F.3d 198 (2d Cir. 2017)
(amicus brief successfully arguing that statute of limitations was tolled and that plan participants could seek reformation as remedy for the fraudulent conversion of their pension plan)
Gearlds v. Entergy Services, Inc., 709 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2013)
(successful amicus brief arguing that district court decision should be reversed and worker who was misinformed about insurance coverage should be allowed to sue fiduciary for resulting damages)
Cyr v. Reliance Standard, 624 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc)
(successful amicus brief before the en banc Ninth Circuit that plan participants can sue insurance companies for benefits)
Solis v. Federal Employers Labor Relations Ass’n, 644 F.3d 221 (4th Cir. 2011)
(successful brief defending district court decision that plan fiduciaries may not generally claim attorney-client privilege in ERISA suits)
Vaughn v. Bay Environmental, 567 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009)
(one of a series of successful amicus briefs on the ability of a former employee to sue for benefits)
Johnson v. Couturier, 572 F.3d 10, 67 (9th Cir. 2007)
(successful amicus brief limiting indemnification agreements)
Milofsky v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 442 F.3d 311 (5th Cir. 2006)
(successful amicus brief and argument before the en banc Fifth Circuit, which vacated a panel decision and held that a breach of fiduciary suit need not benefit all pension plan participants)
LeBlanc v. Cahill, 153 F.3d 134 (4th Cir. 1998)
(amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA did not preempt a state law action for fraud against a non-fiduciary and that ERISA provides a cause of action against a third-party who knowingly participates in a fiduciary breach)
In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative ERISA Litig., 284 F. Supp. 2d 511 (S.D. Tex. 2003)
(successful brief defeating motions to dismiss in massive ERISA lawsuit following the collapse of Enron; the case, brought by both private parties and the Department of Labor, ultimately settled for over $37,000,000)
Michelle Roberts is one of the most passionate, compassionate, caring attorneys I have ever encountered. When the disablty insurance company whose premiums I paid without fail every single months for many years denied my claim,...
my special gratitude to Ms Roberts for being amazingly supportive and willing to help potential clients like me without any expectation She is very knowledgeable about ERISA law She has helped me with all my...
When the insurance company unfairly denied my claim for long-term disability, I hired Michelle to handle my appeal. She and her staff were so easy to work with and made me feel comfortable (and less...
Representing Clients Throughout California. Do not navigate through the legal complexities that are ahead without our supportive assistance and effective legal representation! We know how to get your insurance claim paid.
Schedule your consultation today.
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing certain contact information herein, you are expressly authorizing the recipient of this message to contact you via the methods of communication provided.